Karen Kornbluh: Can CHIPS+ Cure America’s Economic Cynicism?
In the midst of high concern about the economy and following the failure of the climate and social spending bill that once contained President Biden’s Build
In the midst of high concern about the economy and following the failure of the climate and social spending bill that once contained President Biden’s Build
While privacy and competition law pursue different goals, they can exist harmoniously under the right regulatory paradigm. Both areas of law,
This op-ed was originally published in Protocol. By Edward “Smitty” Smith When the world came undone in March 2020, technology made the impossible possible, at
Current headlines remind us that security matters, in all of its forms. Top of mind for those of us in the cybersecurity community is whether critical infrastructure functions, defense forces can communicate, citizens are accessing truthful information, and the technology underpinnings of economic and national security can be trusted and are available.
Anxiety is not translating into commensurate action to protect their personal data online. It is essential that those of us in technology leadership positions boost public awareness and help users adopt smart and simple steps they can take to regain control over their online security.
Nationally recognized leaders come together to advance a holistic trust policy framework: Trusted Future, a think and do tank dedicated to enhancing trust in today’s digital ecosystem, today announced that it is bringing together some of the nation’s most respected leaders and trusted experts to serve on its Board of Advisors.
We need a new approach to trust — one that sets out a future-focused Trust Framework laying out key indicia of security and privacy and allows a technology producer or service provider to understand the holistic criteria they could meet that would enable someone to trust their product or service — and if they’d like, state or certify that they exhibit indicia of trust.